iPad Adventures
|
|
iPad  adventures
|
|
a. To express Bergsonian Time: beyond the insipid snapshots of time, the continuous indivisible Time that only is approximated in the clock time version needed to “be on time” in our daily tasks or to perform technical computations.
b. To give the feeling of a painted scene. I believe that in this way one may get what Proust’s complex recovering of one’s past is about. I have the idea that this process may well be extended to pick up from a foreign (to us) location thoughts and feelings not experienced by ourselves from a past embedded in the location.Ref. Rupert Shelldrake Morphogenetic Field? |
|
|
The past recovered, Fiumicino 
|
|
Silly comparison, just bytes that will perish in my hard disk and will be destined for oblivion
|
|
| Bergsonian
time is an amazing idea. I used to despise it long ago when I was a
science fan and followed ardently Bertrand Russell's refutation to
Bergson. Today I am considering more carefully the idea that Time is
indivisible and not just a sequence of snapshots. Having said that, my
conclusion is that long exposure describes better reality than "focused"
descriptions. That is why I think there is a huge difference between
painting and photography in general. |
|
| Time a la Bergson. Enjoy |
|
| 
|
|
|
Another sample of "dogmatic thought"?
|
|
|
Ludwig Wittgenstein once said that “it is in speaking that we discover what is that we want to say”
It is in painting that we disclose our images?
|
|
What is Time? For physicists it is basically the Line of the Real Numbers System; just a little more than the 2500 years old definition of Aristotle. Naive, naive, naive.. 
|
|
|
|
